Oh Sunny! Sunny! Sunny! I am on the verge of giving it up. I tried my best to understand what you were trying to say but hmmm... NO, you are either really unfathomable or just plain naive. I was flabbergasted at your contradictory stance. On one hand, you say fantasizing about others is sin but at the same time you advocate \"free-sex\" and even go to the extent of advertising for \"mail-friends\" who are willing to kiss you!!!???? Anyway let me try one last time to reason out with you. <BR><BR>Thinking about woman/man or admiring beauty is not a sin. It’s a sin only when you are desperate to \"possess\" it. All normal sane persons know where to draw the line. For e.g., a married man (or everyone) admires the beauty of Aishwarya Rai. That doesn\'t mean he is committing a sin. He may not even be lusting for her or he might be fantasizing about her. All are absolutely normal. The problem comes only when he tries to live these fantasies with the person he is fantasizing irrespective of whether the person is willing or not. That\'s where he crosses the line. (Pardon my sexist language, but it’s too tedious to write everything in a neutral gender. By “he”, I meant he or she). And let me clear some more misapprehensions you have about a \"simple\" practice which almost everyone indulges or has indulged in past. You DON\'T lose any energy nor does it cause hormonal imbalance. Again, one has to know where to draw the line. If one is just living for \"that\", then he/she really needs some professional help. And during the \"practice\" if you are fantasizing about someone, it’s not a sin. Another example, let\'s take hunger. That can be satiated by any edible food. But we still treat ourselves with all sorts of food. And what do we do if we don\'t get all varieties, we either reconcile to whatever we have or \"imagine\" that we are having all the delicacies in spite of having the pretty normal regular stuff. You may say we are cheating ourselves. But then, do we have a choice?? <BR><BR>Please come to terms that any sexual act is a normal physiological process (just like hunger or thirst) and there is NOTHING FILTHY. The only difference is this act has to be indulged in a responsible way because of societal norms, morals, etc., etc. In fact, that\'s what differentiates us from animals. We just can\'t go about pairing with anyone and procreating. The societal norms vary from culture to culture and that\'s where the much hackneyed EAST-WEST divide comes into picture.<BR><BR>And Cliffhanger, the westerners do not \"avoid kids\" because they are worried about their country\'s population. It’s because they wait for certain stability so that they can really support the family. Or simply, they don\'t want to get into the \"hassles\". What pains me is we always look towards the West to ape the practices which they themselves have admitted as \"not right\" and are trying desperately for corrective measures. For heaven\'s sake let\'s come out of this notion (Hollywood movies have to be blamed for this) that the West has no moral fabric and anyone can \"sleep\" with anyone. Believe me, ITS NOT AT ALL LIKE THAT. Yes, the west might look to be sexually promiscuous. But, whatever (pre-marital, post-marital or extra-marital) be the nature of sexual act, it’s done in relatively more \"responsible\" way than in India. That\'s one of the reasons why the incidence of AIDS is more in India/Africa than USA in spite of all the taboos and morals and strict social fabric. Unfortunately, India is not in a stage to handle a \"free-society\" yet. Sunny, why not change your topic into a more constructive way - making everyone especially teenagers sexually aware (not in your sense

of course). Especially after seeing your postings and your misconceptions about some normal innocuous practice, I feel, there is indeed an urgent pressing need for youth to be really educated with matters concerning one of the basal instincts.