vakibs wrote:Hello there
I have no complaints if Telangana seperates away. It is better to get seperated than to keep whining like this. I tell you - Andhra people have nothing to lose if Telangana is chipped away. The Andhra region would have a high literacy rate and enough source of funds. It has a diverse landscape - with mountains, sea-coast, fertile soils, mineral deposits and thousands of dialects for speech.
You all should have think it before coming and settling here. We don't have problem who has settled here (telangana politicians and also civilians have no problem with this as any one can settle any where in India) but seeing your resources and can you go away from here. Answer would be-> NO
vakibs wrote:I consider myself a Telugu nationalist and think of all Telugu speaking people as my brothers. If you have problems with this, well, that is YOUR problem.
This is not a problem between I & YOU. Individually we also have friends from Andhra Region and our discussion goes in a general way. This is problem of a region.
vakibs wrote:And about your comparison with Britishers, man, you are sad

We were a colony of England, that means we were exploited economically - VERY BADLY. Indian nationalist movement is more about "economic independence" than about self-respect "Aathma-gauravam".
Do you know what two Telanganites talk:
"We are colony of ANDHRA, that means we are being exploited economically - VERY BADLY. Telangana movement is more about "economic independence" & also about self-respect "Aathma-gauravam".
vakibs wrote:When you say things like Britishers developed India (which is what KCR has said by the way),
We(youth of Telangana) are not supporter of TRS & we don't listen what KCR is saying everyday & we don't beleive him.
We also know the fact that -- he is really a clown who didn't got ticket in TDP and started the Telangana movement for his benefit.
But do you know that this movement is not first time. And KCR beleived he would sustain with this movement as the Telangana sentiment is there in people from 30-40 years back.
And we people also require a person to stand for us & that is achieved by KCR.
When he joined with congress & Telangana was not formed in last 2 years then we Telangana people has voted to TDP in MPTC & ZPTC elections. Seeing that only he has resigned for all posts and now has total dedication for the movement.
We don't care if he is benefited b'cos of movement.
vakibs wrote:(which is what KCR has said by the way),
Thank you for listening to his statements. But why you people are listening to him??????
vakibs wrote:When you say things like Britishers developed India
I didn't say Britishers developed India. I said Industrial Revolution was started more by them. you should have read care fully.
vakibs wrote:you don't know how STUPID you look.
You don't know how IDIOT & STUPID you look when you say this to me.
While I didn't started scolding for you for any reason. Be careful before abusing anybody.
vakibs wrote:Look at the figures of per capita income between 1700 and 1947 for both India and England. You will see what I am talking about.
I have nothing to do with those figures.
vakibs wrote:Do you know whyChina is progressing consistently with a 10 growth rate ? Do you know the share of the industrial investment done in China by expatriate Chinese (non-resident Chinese) What are the same figures for India ? We make for a very sad comparison. The reason for this is the lack of the spirit of nationalism in India - a nationalism defined on a common language and culture. This is exactly where Telugu nationalism connects the dots.
Now I don't think comparision to different country for a problem in 1 state of India is logical. This is internal problem not a country problem.
check this link for our competitive ness in economic growth:
"http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2006/gb20061102_791191.htm?chan=rss_topEmailedStories_ssi_5"
check this link for the negative side also "http://countrystudies.us/china/34.htm" which says:
"Numerous reports surfaced of coercive measures used to achieve the desired results of the one-child policy. The alleged methods ranged from intense psychological pressure to the use of physical force, including some grisly accounts of forced abortions and infanticide. Chinese officials admitted that isolated, uncondoned abuses of the program occurred and that they condemned such acts, but they insisted that the family planning program was administered on a voluntary basis using persuasion and economic measures only. International reaction to the allegations were mixed. The UN Fund for Population Activities and the International Planned Parenthood Association were generally supportive of China's family planning program. The United States Agency for International Development, however, withdrew US$10 million from the Fund in March 1985 based on allegations that coercion had been used. "
Now do you think this system if implemented in India what happens again? We also have same population problem that also we can't control compared to china. Now that is again a total country's problem (out of discussion)
