news - read the above post
views - *dhadang dhadang dhadang* ye padne ke baad kuch logau ke dil toot ne waale hain..

Moderator: The Moderator Team
...great news...ist abt time we had that rule...going by the horrible traffic...[/quote]...Maki aab aur ek bahana, tholau ko note banana ka. Todo todo note todo mamu.Cracked Nut wrote:News :![]()
Helmet rule ara kate re baap...
CtrlAltDel wrote:just invest abt 500 -800 bucks once in a good helmet...no need to pay the cops
azazel wrote:CtrlAltDel wrote:just invest abt 500 -800 bucks once in a good helmet...no need to pay the cops
yea.. safer man.. ur head's one thing u dun wanna crack..
lotsa helmets are below 1000. the ones below 500 cud be cheap plastic shells that wud serve no purpose.Cracked Nut wrote:Azazel kahan ke hain chicha aap? 500 - 800 me kaun si helmet aati.
no, u r wrong. show me that study. fatalities on two-wheelers reduce if helmets are used. its fact n comon sense. if head cracks u r either die or require expensive complicated surgery with possible bad consequenses. if any other bone cracks...u can heal and come back in action.Cracked Nut wrote:Records show same number of fatalties with and without helmet.
wrong. laws wont make roads accident free. are there no road accidents in develped countries where laws are implemented? in developed countries helmets are compulsory for two-wheeler riders and no one protests or makes half-arsed commets bcoz they know how dangerous not wearing a helmet is.Cracked Nut wrote:Agar traffic ki fikar hain to license ke laws and test tough karo. Without proper license straight 6 mahine andar (jail karo). Traffic sense bhi badthi, educated drivers bhi road pe aate. RTC aur heavy vehicles ke stringent laws rakho. Helmet se yeh sub to nahi badlta.
the easiest way to avoid that is to buy a good helmet...simple.Cracked Nut wrote:HELMET RULE IS JUST ANOTHER REASON FOR MAMU KO PAISE KHILANA!!!
wat doesnt?Nyx! wrote:woooo...does not look too good
![]()
exactly what i am saying. even the law is broken in developed countries resulting in accidents. what chance does poor law have in india?CRACKED NUT wrote:-- 40 % of accidents are under the influence of alcohol and drugs (Breaking of Law not wrong law)
-- 20 % due to underage / unlicensed drivers (Breaking of law
- 40 % due to user mistake, over speeding etc, which could again end up due to BAC etc.
u r wrong. we have good laws on traffic control and if implemented properly everything wud be ok. nether the citizens care for laws nor the cops interested in implementing it.OUR PROBLEM IS WE HAVE THE LAW ITSELF WHICH IS WRONG
that doc represnts a US study. US is a country where traffic laws are implemented strictly. still accidents happen. what does that say?CRACKED NUT wrote:http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30 ... 2Final.pdf
the fact is here we are discussing abt whether helmets will decrease fatalities in 2-wheeler accidents. i dont know what arguement can be put forward to prove it doesnt make a differenceCRACKED NUT wrote:Get your facts right CtrlAltDel. Not just hypothetical presumptions.
not possible to Eliminate fatal accidents. this is reality. we can only try to reduce the deaths...and helmet is one way of doing it.CRACKED NUT wrote:TO ELIMINATE GET TOUGHER On Bureaucrat, NOT THE COMMON CITIZEN.
ppl breaking law does not mean law is insufficient. it only means ppl dont follow the existing law n the bureaucrats dont care. in front of an apathetic official machinery even the tuffest law wud fail. and any tuff law will never deter a citizen who has made up his/her mind to break them....unless threatened with death sentence or long prison terms.Cracked Nut wrote:The LAW IN INDIA IS NOT SUFFICIENT. In Hyd alone 60 % ppl travel without a license.
The 40 % that travel with a license have either bribed thier way or passed a test which is a joke a sham.
how? what has helmets to do with all that, as u yrself say in next sentence:Cracked Nut wrote:Before introducing helmets, get these things straight. Then helmets will serve a purpose.
exactly. wearing helmets wud greatly reduce the risk of death. if u dont wear helmets, u can as well say final goodbyes before every trip.Cracked Nut wrote:helmets or no helmets accidents will happen.
what has all this to do with the fact that helmets wud reduce fatal accidents?Cracked Nut wrote:Get the licensing process organised. TO eliminate license less riders, put them in jail straight 6-12 months no questions asked. It will automatically get ppl to RTA.
Have right ppl there with a more realistic driving test.
:? if u feel u have a better chance of survivin a 2-wheeler accident WITHOUT a helmet....u r fooling yrselfCracked Nut wrote:Who are you trying to fool around by bringing a helmet rule.
which is a bigger burden: investing a few hundreds in a helmet once or spending lakhs later on expensive treatment or worse death.Cracked Nut wrote:Another burden on the people.?
no. i am a supporter of helmets.Cracked Nut wrote:Are you a Helmet dealer
Cracked Nut wrote:helmets or no helmets accidents will happen.
Who are you trying to fool around by bringing a helmet rule.
Another burden on the people. ?
Cracked Nut wrote:A Whole lotta Rubbish!
Return to Dakhni-Mehfil - The Old World Hyderabad
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
{{todos[0].text}}